<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><id>tag:qsgx-qsgx.blog.co.uk,2009-11-08:/</id><title>QSGX</title><link rel="self" href="http://qsgx-qsgx.blog.co.uk/feed/atom/comments/"/><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://qsgx-qsgx.blog.co.uk/"/><subtitle>Copyright reserved by the author of this blog</subtitle><generator version="1.0">MokoFeed</generator><updated>2009-11-08T04:02:00+01:00</updated><entry><id>tag:qsgx-qsgx.blog.co.uk,2007-01-21:/2007/01/21/the_universal_law_of_pressure~1591356/#c2627690</id><title>In response to:The universal law of pressure</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://qsgx-qsgx.blog.co.uk/2007/01/21/the_universal_law_of_pressure~1591356/#c2627690"/><author><name>Munzly</name></author><published>2007-01-21T09:38:30+01:00</published><updated>2007-01-21T09:38:30+01:00</updated><content type="html">It's fun to have your own pet theories, but please don't confuse them with reality. I'm afraid that pretty much everything you state is easily refuted with commonly available, properly attested science. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Still, I enjoyed the romance of your version :)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Hermit (the scientist)</content></entry></feed>
